[ale] Fast NFS

[Christopher Fowler]

Because I've not decided to keep this arch yet. I have the full dev kit
for it so I'm testing some of our apps before I go to the trouble of
creating a whole environment.  

Any environment I create has to be replicated and standard for my other
programmers.  I'm not the only one developing.

On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 16:42, Mike Panetta wrote:
> Why are you doing a native compile?  Why do you not
> cross compile it?  Thats the standard way to set up
> a system like this...
> 
> Mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Fowler <cfowler at outpostsentinel.com>
> Sent: Sep 12, 2004 9:49 AM
> To: Stephan Uphoff <ups at tree.com>
> Cc: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale at ale.org>
> Subject: Re: [ale] Fast NFS
> 
> I think it may be related to the ARM board.  It has only 32mb of mem and
> that is not much when compiling glibc.
> 
> Here is kernel log:
> 
> __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x92/0)
> __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x92/0)
> __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x92/0)
> __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x92/0)
> __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (gfp=0x92/0)
> 
> Which tells me we are running out of memeory.
> 
> On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 23:54, Stephan Uphoff wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 23:12, Christopher Fowler wrote:
> > > Funmy.
> > > 
> > > I can't imagine a busty load.  I'm on a 100mbs switch and all I'm doing
> > > on the ARM is compiling GCC.  What else could be going on that the NFS
> > > server does not respond?  It is only serving up one share to one
> > > machine.  It is doing nothing else.
> > 
> > Are you using NFS2 or NFS3 ?
> > 
> > Have you tried to reduce the write/read size all the way down to 1024 ?
> > 
> > Some network cards are just overwhelmed when a packet train for
> > a big NFS request/reply is coming in.
> > 
> > What NIC are you using on the server?
> > 
> > How big is the receive queue on your arm board? 
> > Can the board get enough memory to replace the buffers used
> > by the received frames?
> > 
> > As always a network sniffer is your best friend.
> > 
> > 
> > 	Stephan
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 21:29, Pete Hardie wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:32:58 -0400, Stephan Uphoff <ups at tree.com> wrote:
> > > > > My guess is that IP fragmentation issues (packet loss under load, busty
> > > > > load .. ) are killing you. (You are using UDP right ?)
> > > >
> > > > "Busty load"???  When did they extend NFS to recognize porn? :->
> > 
> > NFS 6 ?
> > 
> > Not that I know of - but NFS 4 gained non persistent file handles for
> > the MS crowd :-( .... so they are definitely trying for mass appeal :-)
> > 
> > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Ale mailing list
> > > > Ale at ale.org
> > > > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ale mailing list
> > > Ale at ale.org
> > > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> > > 
> > > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> 
>