[ale] Its over. Maybe

[Geoffrey]

Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-05 at 13:13 -0500, Geoffrey wrote:
> 
> 
>>I never once stated that, so chicken little, the sky is not falling...
> 
> Stated what?  You said that you wanted independent review.  SAIC did an
> independent review.  You are still wanting more independent review.  One
> can only assume that you are not yet convinced.

The independent review identified problems with the system.  Let me be 
clear.  An independent review where identified issues are addressed.

>>
>>?[t]he system, as implemented in policy, procedure, and technology, is 
>>at high risk of compromise."
> 
> 
> THAT IS MY POINT!!!  The *implementation*, and the way the system is
> managed, is the problem, NOT the hardware.  YOU obviously haven't read
> the report.
> 
> 
>>Did you read the other documents?  The RABA report?
> 
> 
> No.  I only read the one independent report.

Then you're basing you discussion on only a portion of the data.

> 
>>I'm beginning to think you're just trolling as well.
> 
> 
> Classic Internet excuse for someone in an uncomfortable position ("I
> didn't say what I said")

Uncomfortable?  What a joke.  You made an assumption.  I did not say 
that I personally wanted to review the system.  I did not say what you 
derived with your illogical process.

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey