[ale] Its over. Maybe

[Jim Popovitch]

That same article also identifies a second mfgr of voting systems, this
clearly disputes those that ignorantly claim that Diebold has a monopoly
on voting systems.

-Jim P.

On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 22:55 -0500, Pete Hardie wrote:
> /. had an article that claimed that if only one from from every voting
> machine had been set to a particular candidate (Dem/Rep), the 2000
> election would have been an uncontested win for that candidate. 
> Imagine how easy it would be to rig an electronic voting machine
> program to do that?
>