[ale] Its over. Maybe

[Geoffrey]

Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-11-03 at 20:17 -0500, David Corbin wrote:
> 
>>> Many people (entities too) have looked at Diebold.
>> 
>> And most if not all that have looked at Diebold have said it
>> shouldn't be used without serious changes.
> 
> 
> I find that hard to believe.   Are you sure that it isn't most if not
>  all, of those that you believe, have said that it shouldn't be used 
> without serious changes?  I would think that if everyone said it 
> shouldn't be used we would have heard more about this in the
> mainstream circles, day after day.

There are some very good and highly qualified privacy experts who have 
stated these machines should not be used.  I'll provide one link from 
Avi Rubin's home page.  Avi is highly regarded in the security/privacy 
circles:

http://avirubin.com/vote/analysis/index.html

-- 
Until later, Geoffrey