[ale] Simple QoS

[James Sumners]

Cool.

On 09 Mar 2004 20:06:57 -0500
Chris Fowler <cfowler at outpostsentinel.com> wrote:

> I ran it after and I see an immediate difference.
> 
> Works great!
> 
> On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 19:50, james at sumners.ath.cx wrote:
> > I have no idea. I haven't had a chance to mess with it myself; I just
> > know that it is designed for home broadband connections that are easily
> > affected by uploading. I really need to start working on it though,
> > playing games and getting lag in the middle because your room mates
> > start uploading stuff is annoying.
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:34:44PM -0500, Chris Fowler wrote:
> > > should I run the shaping rules before or after my iptables rules for
> > > firewall and masq?
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 18:58, james at sumners.ath.cx wrote:
> > > > http://lartc.org/wondershaper/
> > > > 
> > > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 06:47:02PM -0500, Chris Fowler wrote:
> > > > > I'm trying to setup a simple QoS rule that will limit my SMTP traffic
> > > > > to 10% of total bandwidth.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Here is the problem.  I have a 256k uplink.  When I send mail with
> > > > > attachments it can use all of the bandwidth.  What I would like to do
> > > > > is limit SMTP traffic out to max out at 10% of the total uplink speed.
> > > > >  I
> > > > > do not want to reserve any bandwidth.  I just want to limit the amount
> > > > > that can be consumed. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Anyone have a quick and easy way to do this?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Chris
> > > > > 
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Ale mailing list
> > > > > Ale at ale.org
> > > > > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ale mailing list
> > > Ale at ale.org
> > > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale


-- 

I used to be interested in Windows NT, but the more I see of it the more it
looks like traditional Windows with a stabler kernel. I don't find anything
technically interesting there. In my opinion MS is a lot better at making money
than it is at making good operating systems.  -- Linus Torvalds
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available