[ale] Re: failure delivery

[Jim Popovitch]

Another reason not to use spambag....

-Jim P.

On Sun, 2004-12-19 at 19:20 +0000, MAILER-DAEMON at yahoo.com wrote:
> Message from  yahoo.com.
> Unable to deliver message to the following address(es).
> 
> <rsj at radio.org>:
> 199.5.193.4 does not like recipient.
> Remote host said: 550 Service unavailable; Client host [216.136.173.32] blocked using blacklist.spambag.org; Blocked - see http://www.spambag.org/cgi-bin/spambag?mailfrom=yahoo
> Giving up on 199.5.193.4.
> 
> --- Original message follows.
> 
> Return-Path: <jimpop at yahoo.com>
> Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.3.101?) (jimpop at 66.223.110.199 with plain)
>   by smtp012.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Dec 2004 19:20:20 -0000
> Subject: RE: [ale] Question on Current Red Hat Update Policies
> From: Jim Popovitch <jimpop at yahoo.com>
> To: rsj at radio.org, Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale at ale.org>
> In-Reply-To: <1103483321.22111.5.camel at k4rsj.radio.org>
> References: <20041219181511.5A5F1EFBF at mail.radio.org>
> 	 <1103483321.22111.5.camel at k4rsj.radio.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 14:19:32 -0500
> Message-Id: <1103483972.8493.14.camel at blue>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> 
> On Sun, 2004-12-19 at 14:08 -0500, Randal Jarrett wrote:
> > Check out Dag's site.  He keeps the updates for RHEL on line.
> > At work we use yum with his site.
> > 
> > http://rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/dag/rhel/3/i386/
> 
> Check here for more info: http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/apt/
> 
> -Jim P.
> 
> > 
> > Randy
> > 
> > On Sun, 2004-12-19 at 13:08 -0500, Jerald Sheets wrote:
> > > Yes.
> > > 
> > > RHEL is a commercial project, with licenses and the whole software company
> > > thing.
> > > 
> > > FC is a "bleeding edge" project, with the latest and greatest (and
> > > unstablest....is that a word?)  stuff in it.  You *can*, however, do regular
> > > updates through apt-rpm and yum.
> > > 
> > > I'm using FC2 & 3 in production, becase if it came down to it, I could
> > > update what I have to whatever version I want...no troubles.
> > > 
> > > Jerald M. Sheets jr.
> > > Sr. UNIX Systems Administrator
> > > (404) 293-8762
> > > **********
> > > >su -
> > > Password:
> > > # cat /dev/flood > /dev/earth
> > > # rdev noah if=noah=/dev/earth
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ale-bounces at ale.org [mailto:ale-bounces at ale.org] On Behalf Of Greg
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 11:16 AM
> > > To: ALE
> > > Subject: [ale] Question on Current Red Hat Update Policies
> > > 
> > > I abandoned RH for my home use when they let go of the home user market and
> > > now I am faced with having to use them for a project.  I have downloaded
> > > RHEL 3 and Fedora Core 3 and was wondering if one needs to buy a
> > > subscription to update RHEL or not.  I was also wondering what (if any)
> > > differences there are between RHEL and FC besides the official RH company
> > > support for RHEL.
> > > 
> > > TIA,
> > > 
> > > Greg
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ale mailing list
> > > Ale at ale.org
> > > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> > > 
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > > Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.0 - Release Date: 12/17/2004
> > >  
> > > 
>