[ale] Reply-to change

[James P. Kinney III]

That has changed since you wrote this.

On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 11:14, Jonathan Rickman wrote:
> I just noticed that the reply-to is now set to all. IMHO this is the worst 
> possible configuration. It creates duplicate messages when mistakes are 
> made. I know there are two sides of the reply-to argument, but this is 
> far from a compromise. Now you have the worst of both sides.
-- 
James P. Kinney III          \Changing the mobile computing world/
CEO & Director of Engineering \          one Linux user         /
Local Net Solutions,LLC        \           at a time.          /
770-493-8244                    \.___________________________./
http://www.localnetsolutions.com

GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics) <jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part