[ale] compiled system calls versus shell scripts
Geoffrey
esoteric at 3times25.net
Thu Oct 23 14:52:28 EDT 2003
Bjorn Dittmer-Roche wrote:
> The advantage of make is simply that it's easy and efficient to define
> dependencies.
I don't see the difficulty in defining or addressing dependencies in a
shell script. See my subsequent post with examples. I don't really see
that it is easy to define dependencies in make. It handles them well,
but it's not particularly easy. The more complex the dependencies, the
more complex the make file.
Personal opinion of course...
--
Until later, Geoffrey esoteric at 3times25.net
Building secure systems inspite of Microsoft
More information about the Ale
mailing list