[ale] OT: more info on where all the jobs are (going...)

[ChangingLINKS.com]

Go back through ALL of your posts in this thread. They ALL seem to contain the 
word "ALL." An similarly, other programmers on the list are thinking this 
way.

ALL of AT&T's customers are not IT. ALL of the IT jobs in the US are not going 
to be farmed out. IT does not encompass ALL of the places exIT can work. ALL 
businesses are not blind stupid and uncaring about the US ecomony. Businesses 
do not control ALL of the economy. If you don't work in IT (specifically), 
you will not lose ALL of your money - (and thus not be able to afford AT&T's 
services).

I remember one day when I called my exgirlfriend to borrow $5 to feed myself 
and a completely broke friend. The point? The phone was still on. Maybe I was 
a month late in payment - but nonetheless, I was able to afford the things 
that I needed long enough to get back on my feet. I do remember one other 
thing: ALL of my utilities stayed on during that financial uncertainty.

Drew


On Sunday 16 March 2003 17:39, Geoffrey wrote:
> ChangingLINKS.com wrote:
> > I think that you are missing most of the spectrum.
> >
> > Even if ALL of the IT jobs were to leave this country, I doubt "no one"
> > would be able to afford software. Foriegn cars (in my experience) are
> > usually better made - even to this day (ok limit this to Japan and
> > Germany, and exclude many VWs and Audis).
> >
> > I believe history showed that industry can leave places like PA and
> > Detroit, and we can still have an economic boom in the future (late 90s).
> > America seemed to go from agriculture - to industry - to IT (not a
> > history major over here) and I believe that we can go "to infinity and
> > beyond."
> >
> > I don't believe that foreign policy (exporting labor, importing goods and
> > HB1 issues) are the leading cause of our economic swings.
>
> You've noted that in each of the above industries, something else came a
> long to replace the previous.  So what is going to employ all the IT
> workers?  If I can't find work, then I start spending less money.  There
> goes the dsl, long distance phone calls....  I chose those particular
> 'perks' because the relate more to the company I work for, AT&T.
>
> So,  AT&T sends work overseas, and ex-employees, now are out of work and
> must cut back on certain services.  Who's going to continue purchasing
> those services?
>
> > Drew
> >
> > On Saturday 15 March 2003 21:12, Mike Panetta wrote:
> >>On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 11:55, James P. Kinney III wrote:
> >>>On Sat, 2003-03-15 at 14:26, ChangingLINKS.com wrote:
> >>>>I value your opinion in this case. However, I don't think that
> >>>>corporations are short-sighted, blind or stupid.
> >>>
> >>>Corporations are neither short-sighted, blind or stupid. They are
> >>>single-minded. That single-minded purpose is bottom-line profit. That is
> >>>the only reason corporations exist. They will do anything to boost that
> >>>bottom line. As a rule, corporations have no morals. As morals have no
> >>>weight on the balance sheet, there is no reason to have morals. So they
> >>>don 't.
> >>>
> >>>If a corporation sees that they can produce their product for lees cost
> >>>that they are right, they will change production methods. There is no
> >>>thought to any factor other than the bottom line.
> >>
> >>Isn't the bottom line kinda pointless if there is no one left employed in
> >>a capacity that would allow them to buy the product for the prices its
> >> sold for?  I see (or rather hear of) all these companies outsourcing all
> >> the IT work, and yet I do not hear of any of them reducing prices.  How
> >> can anyone but other corporations afford to buy any of these software
> >> products if the price is not reduced?  Even if all IT workers in the US
> >> went out and found lower paying jobs tomorrow just to put food on the
> >> table, how could they afford to purchase any of the products that are
> >> being manufactured by these companies?
> >>
> >>How can corporations exist without employees?  Someone somewhere has to
> >>produce what the company sells.  There also must exist a consumer to buy
> >>the product. A consumer cannot consume without the resources to do so, so
> >>they must seek employment at a corporation.  If all corporations
> >> outsource all their employees, they will have lost their consumers as
> >> well...  Or am I missing something?
> >>
> >>I do not for see this as being anything but a disaster for the economy of
> >>the US. It seems that capitalism has failed...
> >>
> >>Mike
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Ale mailing list
> >>Ale at ale.org
> >>http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale

-- 
Wishing you Happiness, Joy and Laughter,
Drew Brown
http://www.ChangingLINKS.com
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale