Fw: [ale] Self destructing DVD's (OT)

[Robert L. Harris]

It's likely more of an oxidation thing than a heat thing otherwise the
heat from the reading would likely burn it immediatly.

Wonder if RonCo will come out with an OxyClean for DVDs...


Thus spake Steve Long (stl2 at mindspring.com):

> Would putting the DVD in the freezer after you view it the first time slow
> the process down enough to make it viewable for months at a time?
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Nathan J. Underwood" <lists at cybertechcafe.net>
> To: <ale at ale.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [ale] Self destructing DVD's (OT)
> 
> 
> > My take on this:
> >
> > I agree with the whole DivX thing (fiasco).  Although I was tempted to hop
> on
> > the bandwagon (I just wanted another remote control ;-) ), I didn't.  It
> was
> > just cheaper (and smarter) to spend the extra one or two bucks to get a
> DVD that
> > I could watch over, and over, and over (if I wanted to).  My wife and I
> > generally rent one movie on Friday nights.  We used to rent 2 or 3 (we had
> all
> > weekend to watch them), but kept getting tied up with other stuff, and
> never got
> > to watch them, and still got hit with late fees.  So, now we just get one
> (and
> > it's generally late).  If the self-destructing DVD's were slightly more
> > expensive than a regular DVD rental (but less than the late fees would
> be), I
> > think it could be huge.  It could also allow the movie rental places
> > (blockbuster, hollywood, etc.) to compete with Netflix.  Again, just my
> thoughts
> > on the matter.
> >
> > Quoting Jason Day <jasonday at worldnet.att.net>:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:20:05PM -0400, Adrin wrote:
> > > > Self destructing DVD's (OT)This was already tried on the market once
> > > before.
> > > > I think it was called DVDx, Not sure.  Circuit City and another retail
> > >
> > > It was DivX (not to be confused with the divx video codec, which came
> > > after).  And it was quite a spectacular failure.
> > >
> > > This new version *could* be successful, if they market it correctly.  If
> > > it costs the same as a video rental, or maybe just a wee bit more, and
> > > works in a standard DVD player, then I could see it's value.  I would be
> > > willing to pay a little more to "rent" a DVD that I didn't have to worry
> > > about returning.  Hell, I would probably recoup the extra price by not
> > > having to pay any late fees.
> > >
> > > This could work if they are able to make people think they are
> > > *renting*, not *buying*.  DivX was never able to do that.
> > > -- 
> > > Jason Day                                       jasonday at
> > > http://jasonday.home.att.net                    worldnet dot att dot net
> > >
> > > "Of course I'm paranoid, everyone is trying to kill me."
> > >     -- Weyoun-6, Star Trek: Deep Space 9
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ale mailing list
> > > Ale at ale.org
> > > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> > >
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > Nathan J. Underwood
> > nathan at cybertechcafe.net
> > http://www.cybertechcafe.net
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale

:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris                     | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
                                         @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu 
DISCLAIMER:
      These are MY OPINIONS ALONE.  I speak for no-one else.

Diagnosis: witzelsucht  	

IPv6 = robert at ipv6.rdlg.net	http://ipv6.rdlg.net
IPv4 = robert at mail.rdlg.net	http://www.rdlg.net

 PGP signature