[ale] Download Manager

[James Sumners]

I just wanted to make sure that I understood what he is talking about before
responding.

I never really liked the way Downloader for X works. It just didn't impress me.
However, I do like this one: http://www.kfa.cx/products.php?product=Enqueue

The code is nice and clean and does not require a hundred different libraries to
compile - just GTK. If you read the news on the top level page (kfa.cx) you will
find that they even have a Debian repository for you.

On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 20:22:13 -0500
Jim Philips <jcphil at mindspring.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Saturday 20 December 2003 07:10 pm, James Sumners wrote:
> > What do you mean by "download manager"?
> >
> > On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 14:46:35 +0000
> >
> > Calvin Harrigan <charriglists at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > Earlier today, I found my self in need of a download manager and was
> > > wondering what do you guys use.  Any recommendations?
> 
> The best one is Downloader for X. It will do everything. Find it at:
> 
> http://www.krasu.ru/soft/chuchelo/
> 
> And a "download manager" is just that. It let's you manage multiple downloads 
> and large downloads with interruptions and whatever. Downloader for X is 
> really good.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE/5PXQmqVh/g13CaoRAvddAJ9j5SjVj6ecia2YStSR6KlzyodF3ACcCNnM
> q0V1l+PA/1cesTxR00/Izn8=
> =NmnA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale


-- 

I used to be interested in Windows NT, but the more I see of it the more it
looks like traditional Windows with a stabler kernel. I don't find anything
technically interesting there. In my opinion MS is a lot better at making money
than it is at making good operating systems.  -- Linus Torvalds