[ale] [OT] Georgia Super-DMCA Update
Robert L. Harris
Robert.L.Harris at rdlg.net
Wed Apr 23 08:06:51 EDT 2003
A good plea would be to hit the non-techies also.
Mention how real life for non-techies would also be affected. Most
people don't realistally see their Fridge connected to the net. Hit
them with things such as being unable to have a private conversation
with loved ones about personal family matters, etc.
Thus spake Robert Coggins (ale at cogginsnet.com):
> Sounds great! I would even say something about the refrigerators and other
> items in the future that will be using the internet. These would be illegal
> too. I would put it in right after you explain the items you already have.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
> Rob
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dylan Northrup" <docx at io.com>
> To: <ale at ale.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 5:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [ale] [OT] Georgia Super-DMCA Update
>
>
> > Mike Lockhart wrote:
> >
> > >Directions? Any ideas what kinda notes i should take to be prepared for
> > >this? (i'm not the most politically aware person)
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Directions should be nice. If offered the opportunity to speak, here's
> > what I'll try to say:
> >
> > "Thank you for allowing me to speak. I will be as brief as I can
> > expressing my views on the broad impact of this legislation. I am a
> > computer professional and use my broadband internet connection to
> > telecommute to my job. My boss is located in Virginia, his boss is
> > located in California and my company is based out of Texas. Yet I
> > choose to live, work, pay taxes and vote in Georgia because I enjoy the
> > freedoms, culture and lifestyle that it affords. In addition, by
> > telecommuting as I do and not driving into an office, I do not
> > contribute to the traffic congestion that is endemic to working in and
> > around Atlanta. As a computer professional, I have several machines at
> > home that all can communicate with the Internet. A desktop computer, a
> > laptop, multiple servers and two game systems. I plan on purchasing more
> > "internet aware" devices in the near future including a Tivo, another
> > game system, a computer for my son and more test servers to help with my
> > professional growth. I currently do this all with a single internet
> > connection using a device that mediates or proxies my outgoing
> > connections. It is a convenience to have my computers all connected to
> > the internet concurrently. I avoid having to disconnect one host and
> > connect another, one of the benefits highly touted by phone and cable
> > companies when they market their high speed internet services. In
> > addition, it is a security measure. Because the computers on my network
> > are hidden behind a firewall that conceals the origin of traffic from
> > and the destination of return traffic to devices on my home network., no
> > computer on the Internet can contact any machine on my home network
> > unless I allow it. This affords me protection from malicious hackers,
> > viruses and those willing to exploit new vulnerabilities with software
> > running on computers connected to my internal network.
> >
> > If this bill passes there are several provisions I will be in violation
> > of. My wireless access point is a retransmitting commucations device.
> > My web browser decrypts online purchases and bank transactions without
> > contacting my ISP for permission. When I purchase a newer model of
> > router and sell my old one on ebay I will be advertising for sale and
> > transferring to another a communications device that conceals the origin
> > and destination of traffic. Because of the overly broad nature of the
> > definitions of communications device, communication service and
> > communication service provider I will be in violation of several aspects
> > of this law even though I have not committed any other crime and do not
> > intend to do so in the future. I will be forced to either carry on in
> > violation of the law and hope that judicial interpretation eventually
> > curtails or overrules this overly broad legislative language; change the
> > way I work and live thereby reducing my quality of life and introducing
> > more stress into my already busy and overworked time; or relocate away
> > from the state that I had hoped to make a home for myself and my family
> > for years and decades to come. I would hope the committee would
> > consider the legislation before it and do everything in its power to
> > prevent its passage. I am one of thousands and tens of thousands high
> > tech employees in this state that would be affected by this legislation
> > and won't be the only one considering whether to take my family, my job
> > and my taxes elsewhere.
> >
> > Thank you for your time."
> >
> >
> > Doing a read through, this clocks in at just over two minutes. I am
> > trying to figure out how to squeeze in something about pervasive
> > consumer electronics devices in the future that will be internet aware,
> > but can't figure out the right verbiage. If I can't think of something,
> > I'll just go with what I have here.
> >
> > --
> > Dylan Northrup <*> docx at io.com <*> http://www.io.com/~docx/
> > "Easy to bitch, easy to whine, easy to moan, easy to cry, easy to feel
> > like there ain't nothing in your life. Harder to work, harder to
> > strive, hard to be glad to be alive, but it's really worth it if you
> > give it a try." -- Cowboy Mouth, 'Easy'
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | PGP Key ID: E344DA3B
@ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
Diagnosis: witzelsucht
IPv6 = robert at ipv6.rdlg.net http://ipv6.rdlg.net
IPv4 = robert at mail.rdlg.net http://www.rdlg.net
PGP signature
More information about the Ale
mailing list