[ale] ALE reply-to changes needed??

[James P. Kinney III]

On Sun, 2003-04-13 at 10:16, aaron wrote:
> [after some heavy snippage...]

> 
> So if we all agree that community participation is the principle idea,
> it follows logically that responding to the community should be the principle
> mode of reply. At least that's why my sentiment is that the list is correct 
> the way it currently operates.

Agreed. List should be the principle mode of reply. But it should not be
the mandated one. All interactions in this community should be
voluntary.

I vote we let the mailing list admin make the choice as that is the
person who has the access to the software anyway. I will use what ever
broken system is in place unless I am forced to install M$ crap to
access the list. :)

-- 
James P. Kinney III          \Changing the mobile computing world/
CEO & Director of Engineering \          one Linux user         /
Local Net Solutions,LLC        \           at a time.          /
770-493-8244                    \.___________________________./
http://www.localnetsolutions.com

GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics) <jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7 

 This is a digitally signed message part