[ale] [OT] White flag
hbbs at attbi.com
hbbs at attbi.com
Thu Apr 3 08:51:17 EST 2003
Is the distinction being made here one of writing cost-per-license software for
MS platforms and writing Open Source software? If so, then I don't think it's a
very fair comparison because they are not the same job, even though the task
looks the same.
If you're coding cost-per-license software, you are essentially being paid on
spec, i.e., the revenue from the licenses is supposed to backfill what you were
being paid. On the other hand, if you're coding Open Source software, that
stream isn't going to exist, but you would instead be being paid either on spec
out of money that comes from some service that the software provides, even if
indirectly.
Here's an example of a situation that I myself had to consider a couple years
back. Suppose you're working on an document imaging project and there's a brand
new scanner on the market that you want to utilize, and you've decided to go the
Linux route on the scanning platform (one reason one might be driven to do this
is because you need to have a large number of scanners running in parallel and
you don't want to have the overhead {admin or $$} of a large number of M$
licenses). If you want to use that scanner and no pre-existing SANE driver
exists, then you get to be the one who writes it. So, you hire a programmer to
work up a driver for you, expecting to GPL the driver and give it back to the
community.
I see nothing wrong with this. You pay the programmer based on the revenue
generated by the commercial demand for your document imaging services, not
directly from revenue generated by selling the software. The work is not
time-indefinite; it's finished when the driver works to your satisfaction.
- Jeff
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:10:51PM -0500, Greg wrote:
> > ok, Open Source rates:$10 to $20/hr (very rare). MS rates: $35/hr (less
> > rare). I just got a job as a MS programmer (FT). So.... after 15 months of
> > real sketchy contract (read: non-existent) work I am laughing all the way to
> > the bank.
>
> Open source rates of only $20/hr? That's someone essentially asking you
> to work for free. There always are LOTS of people taking advantage of
> people in desperate situations.
>
> > Call me a bum if you want, but at least I can afford to pay my mortgage
> > (unlike my neighbor - who was foreclosed on along with his wife and 1 year
> > old kid). Tough times call for tough calls and I would rather be an
> > employed MS programmer/sys admin than an unemployed Open Source
> > programmer/sys admin.
>
> I WAS kidding about the "bum" part when people have no choice. Sheesh,
> I've advised my out-of-work friends to consider sharpening up their
> MicroSurf skills. If it's fun, it's a hobby. If you only do it 'cause
> they pay you, it's a job. One musn't confuse the two.
>
> > And no - this is not an April Fool's joke.
>
> If it came to that, I'd program on M$ rather than lose my house.
>
> > Greg
> Bob
>
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ale-admin at ale.org [mailto:ale-admin at ale.org]On Behalf Of J.M.
> > > Taylor
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:02 PM
> > > To: ale at ale.org
> > > Subject: Re: [ale] [OT] White flag
>
>
>
>
> > > > Surveys show that Linux and UNIX SysAdmins get paid about twice that of
> > > > Winbloz SysAdmins and last twice as long at their jobs. We can't just
> > > > say "Duh. Something's corrupted. Time to reinstall from scratch." (The
> > > > salary survey is no joke!)
>
>
> > > Only for those Unix admins who are actually *employed* ....
>
> > > jenn
> > > very busy, but completely devoid of paycheck
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
More information about the Ale
mailing list