[ale] C#

[cfowler]

You are correct.  SlickEdit is so much faster than JBuilder, JEdit, or
NetBeans.  Even KDevelop is faster.

But JBuilder rocks!

Chris

On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 20:50, John Wells wrote:
> What?  No evidence of it being slow?!?!
> 
> Maybe for web apps, but for fat clients or self-contained apps, it's a
> snail...for example, take a look at all the *really* nicely designed
> editors (jedit, for example) written in Java.  While the functionality
> makes the speed hit worth it to me, there is quite a discernible
> difference from apps written in C/C++ (even under 1.4.x).
> 
> The fact is, Java will always be slower, in order to accomplish
> cross-platform capabilities.  You just have to decide whether you (or your
> users) can/will live with the slowness.
> 
> If I were going for speed and ease of development, I'd go with C++/Qt.
> 
> John
> 
> Mike Millson said:
> > I concur. I don't see any evidence of Java being slow or limited (on
> > Linux or in general). I have used Java + Tomcat 4.x to interface w/
> > MySQL and Oracle databases and parse large XML feeds and have been very
> > impressed.
> >
> > I also agree w/ the earlier post: C# + linux = insanity.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Denny Chambers [mailto:dchambers at snapserver.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:01 PM
> > Cc: ale at ale.org
> > Subject: Re: [ale] C#
> >
> >
> > Why not stick with Java? Running Java apps under the 1.3.x and 1.4.x
> > JVMs are not that bad. All of those folks complaining about how slow it
> > is, probably haven't used it much since the Java 1.x days. You shouldn't
> > have any problems handling 100+ connections. Look at projects like
> > Tomcat and other Web Application servers, these servers are designed to
> > handle hundreds, even thousands of connections. If you want your app to
> > be web based, I would still recomend Java. Servlet have proven to be
> > very fast at servering dynamic web content. Better than C in cases, and
> > much better than perl. Also Java gives you the portablility you need. It
> > will also make things like internationalization much easier.
> >
> > If your going the web based route, add this site to your research:
> >
> > http://www.2020media.com/support/javavscgi.htm
> >
> > My $0.02,
> >
> > Denny
> >
> > cfowler wrote:
> >
> >>Right now I'm at the beginning of a large Java project.  I'm just
> >> desiging forms for now.  But this is just graphics.  I'm doing research
> >> as to the best way to go.  I need to be scalable when it comes to
> >> threads and I believe that Java may bite me in the end. I want to
> >> handle 100+ TCP connections into one client.
> >>
> >>
> >>On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 14:48, Geoffrey wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>cfowler wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Anyone here using C# on Linux?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>Why would you?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Thanks,
> >>>>Chris
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>---
> >>>>This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
> >>>> See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems
> >>>> should
> > be
> >>>>sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>--
> >>>Until later: Geoffrey		esoteric at 3times25.net
> >>>
> >>>I didn't have to buy my radio from a specific company to listen
> >>>to FM, why doesn't that apply to the Internet (anymore...)?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>---
> >>>This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
> >>> See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems
> >>> should
> > be
> >>>sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>---
> >>This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list. See
> >> http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should
> > be
> >>sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list. See
> > http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
> > sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list. See
> > http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
> >  sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
> See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be 
> sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
> 
> 
> 
> 



---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be 
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.