[ale] Re: Vote Today - Message from Marie
Irv Mullins
irvm at ellijay.com
Tue Nov 5 13:09:00 EST 2002
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 11:35 am, Matt wrote:
> As soon as whatever you vote with/on is removed from your view, there is
> ALWAYS the potential for corruption to occur. Why not just have a little
> faith in the process that's being used and get on with your lives. If you
> feel the process is so flawed, don't use it. Make them work a little
> harder by having to actually fabricate votes rather than just changing
> yours.
There always has been, and will continue to be, vote fraud.
However, consider this: with paper ballots, fraud is basically a local
industry. Cheating by one party in one area is likely to be cancelled out by
cheating by the other party in another. And any massive cheating will involve
lots of people, with increased chances for that fraud to be discovered,
reported, etc.
With computer 'ballots', a single rogue programmer could change the
results of a national election, and, the way things are set up in Georgia,
there would be no way to even detect such fraud. You don't see how
your vote is recorded - just how it appears on the screen. Who's to say
they are the same? Just because you and everyone you know voted for
Joe Blow, if the machines say Sue Smith won, how are you going to contest
that?
How long before some programmer at some voting machine company
sells out for a few million$ and moves to South America?
Sure, the voting machine companies have committees to audit their
code. Just like Microsoft audits the security of their code.
Irv
---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
More information about the Ale
mailing list