[ale] Why so many updates to RedHat?
Michael Hirsch
mhirsch at nubridges.com
Tue Jul 9 16:52:16 EDT 2002
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 16:08, Chris Ricker wrote:
> On 9 Jul 2002, Michael Hirsch wrote:
>
> > You are correct. The errata page doesn't mention most of those files.
> > But when I run up2date -l this is what I get (see below). I don't
> > believe I have messed with up2date at all. I do point to some
> > non-standard apt-get servers, but I use the redhat up2date untouched.
> > This is an awful lot, though I confess much less than 400. It is more
> > like 100 updated packages.
>
> You've broken something! ;-)
I'm prepared to believe that. :-(
>
> > arts 2.2.2 2
>
> arts-1.0.0-4 on a fully up2date'd Red Hat Linux 7.3 system
>
> > dump 0.4b25 1.72.0
>
> Look at the release: 1.72
>
> That's an errata for Red Hat Linux 7.2
>
> > e2fsprogs 1.26 1.72
> > e2fsprogs-devel 1.26 1.72
>
> ditto
>
> > glibc 2.2.4 24
> > glibc-common 2.2.4 24
> > glibc-devel 2.2.4 24
>
> RH 7.3 uses glibc-2.2.5. Again, these are all 7.2.
>
> Check /etc/redhat-release. I think you'll find that your box is 7.2, not
> 7.3.
And yet:
[1001] hirsch>cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Linux release 7.3 (Valhalla)
[1002] hirsch>
???
Aha! I just looked in /etc/sysconfig/rhn/systemid and found this:
<member>
<name>description</name>
<value><string>Red Hat Linux, release 7.3, running on
i686</string></value>
</member>
<member>
<name>os_release</name>
<value><string>7.2</string></value>
</member>
So I seem to think I'm 7.3, but I'm really 7.2. I wonder how that
happened?
Thanks for putting me on the right track.
--Michael
---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
More information about the Ale
mailing list