[ale] IP Masquerading Question

[Ty Connell]

FYI, I have done the same thing with AT&T, albeit not locally.

-----Original Message-----
From: jeff hubbs [mailto:hbbs at mediaone.net]
To: ale at ale.org
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 1:58 PM
To: bkruger at mindspring.com
Cc: ale at ale.org
Subject: Re: [ale] IP Masquerading Question


bkruger at mindspring.com wrote:

> I was looking at installing Knology cable in my house.  One of their plans
requires that you send them the MAC address of the 

 > NIC

 to them for access.
> 
> If this is the case, will IP masquerading for a small subnet "spoof" the
MAC address for all outward packets to the MAC of the NIC attached to the
cable modem?  I've looked over some of the docs for IP Masquerading, but
have not been able to confirm/deny this.  It is probably right under my
nose....  
> 
> Regards - Bob Kruger 

Bob -

Don't take this as gospel, but this is pretty much exactly what I have 
done for ATT Broadband.  I started out with an NE2000 ISA NIC in a 
Windows box just to verify that everything was up and running and then 
moved it to a Coyote Linux box that performs NAT.  All outbound packets 
have the hardware MAC address regardless of their masquerading status.

- Jeff


---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be

sent to listmaster at ale dot org.

---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be 
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.