Re: [ale] Just an FYI for those using UDMA hard drives and RH 7.2
Michael Smith
msmith at mikeandmel.com
Tue Jan 15 13:51:19 EST 2002
I don't know for sure if it needs to be sent to that list or not. I should
probably monitor the list to see if it's a common problem. I did leave out
one major thing...... I am also using raid0 on the 2 drives. This
probably complicates things even more....
I haven't tried using other drives since all I buy are Maxtors and IBM(this
drive is on my wifes pc and I don't want to mess with it). I had several
Western Digitals crash on me in the past so I don't buy them. I could
definitely repeat the steps to make it happen, though....
> Is this something for the kernel development list? Having to take a
> permanent performance hit doesn't strike me as a good solution. Does
> it seem as though Maxtors are the only affected drives?
>
> - Jeff
>
> James P. Kinney III wrote:
>
>> What an arcane problem! Congratulations on getting it resolved. That
>> took some legwork.
>>
>> I can see the reasons for having the option to turn off WV. I take it
>> it was not documented with the drive. It seems a bit underhanded if
>> the WV is turned off for benchmarking but will fail under normal
>> conditions with out it.
>>
>> So, clearly, RedHat 7.2, and presumably Linux in general, will have a
>> hard time with this drive unless WV is always on. Is a write verify
>> CRC check manadatory at all times? Is there an option in /proc/ide
>> that will allow the WV to be turned off from the Linux OS for speed
>> trials? Does this drive come with an installation disk for M$?
>>
>> I don't use any Maxtor drives so my proc shows no WV parameters. I
>> went digging in "man hdparm" and found a -W flag that is used to
>> toggle the write caching. No reference to write verify.
>>
>> On Tue, 2002-01-15 at 12:08, Michael Smith wrote:
>>
>>>I have been fighting for the last 2 weeks trying to get my 7.2 machine
>>>up for more than 12 hours at a time without a kernel panic and I
>>>think I finally got it working...
>>>
>>>I determined that it was a UDMA issue after receiving
>>>{DriveStatusError BadCRC} errors in the messages log file. So I
>>>bought 2 new 80 pin, less than 18 inch, ide cables after reading this
>>>blurb at
>>>http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/#s13-3 . I still received
>>>the errors. So I then moved the hard drives to the bottom and top
>>>bays to hopefully reduce any crosstalk. Still didn't work. I then
>>>moved the power cables as far away from the ide cables as possible.
>>>Still didn't work.
>>>
>>>So now I am thinking that either my controller or my hard drives are
>>>bad. I go to the Maxtor site and download Powermax to test the
>>>drives. I perform exhaustive checks with both drives coming out
>>>without any errors. I am now at a loss.
>>>
>>>So I dig a little more on the Maxtor site about the write verify
>>>functionality on the hard drive and find out, that for speed, the
>>>write verify is turned off after 10 power cycles on the hard drive.
>>>So I downloaded this utility called WVSet from their site and turned
>>>the write verify back on permanently and now my machine has been up
>>>for 24 hours w/o a kernel panic....
>>>
>>>Here's Maxtor's blurb on Write Verify:
>>>
>>>"Write Verify" performs a Read of the data just written to the hard
>>>drive and validates the data via the Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC),
>>>providing additional assurance that the data written to the hard
>>>drive was written correctly. When Write Verify is enabled, the WRITE
>>>performance of the drive is affected as a read occurs for each write.
>>>When disabled WRITE performance is improved as, a read is not
>>>performed for each write When performing benchmark operations the
>>>"write verify" feature should be disabled to insure valid comparisons
>>>to other products that do not offer this capability in their product.
>>>
>>>
>>>Just an FYI......
>>>
>>>--
>>>Michael Smith
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>---
>>>This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
>>>See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems
>>>should be sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
--
Michael Smith
msmith at mikeandmel.com
---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
More information about the Ale
mailing list