[ale] petition

[Russell Hogg]

Forced obsolescence is already a factor in SQL server.  
If I remember correctly, anything before 6.5 won't even run on 2000.  Not
even in "compatibility mode".

Russ


_________________________________________
russellh at x-soft.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Irv Mullins [mailto:irvm at ellijay.com] 
To: ale at ale.org
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:43 PM
To: ale at ale.org
Subject: Re: [ale] petition

On Friday 15 February 2002 09:23 am, Benjamin Dixon wrote:

> Which is unfortunate. But MS seems to realize that their strategy is not
> going to work too much longer. They still have a tight grip on the desktop
> market but it seems the growth potential of that market is capped. How
> much stuff can you possibly add to an OS before you can't add enough major
> features that its marketable as different from your previous release?

Exactly.
Both Microsoft and hardware manufacturers realize that continued exponential

growth just isn't going to happen. They have been relying on the old Detroit

approach (ever larger tail fins, more horsepower, lots of chrome) for a
while 
now, but people are beginning to catch on to that scam. 

If that won't continue to increase sales, then the only thing left is 
forced obsolescence. They're working on that too. I predict that Microsoft 
will soon attempt to make their software a subscription-only product, with a

monthly payment plan (assuring a steady income stream) and automatic 
disconnection if you don't pay on time.

Will this fly? I don't think so, but it will be fun to watch!

Regards,
Irv




---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be

sent to listmaster at ale dot org.

---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be 
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.