[ale] Regarding replies to the list...

[Greg]

I prefer option #2, then #1 - though I believe it is rude to ask a list for
help and then ask for a reply back directly, since they don't subscribe to
the list.  However, I can accept someone posting from a work address where
they don't/cannot subscribe and desire a direct reply.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ale-admin at ale.org [mailto:ale-admin at ale.org]On Behalf Of rhiannen
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 10:37 AM
> To: ale at ale.org
> Subject: Re: [ale] Regarding replies to the list...
>
>
> Add another vote for option 2.
>
> rhia
>
> Geoffrey wrote:
> >
> > Let me make sure we all understand this.  Two folks have indicated they
> > prefer the current setup. In my mind, there are three options.
> >
> > Currently there is no way to send email to the original poster without
> > explicitly typing their email addr into the window.  That to me sucks.
> >
> > 2nd, is selecting reply would reply to the list, selecting reply-all
> > would send email to the list and the poster.  I would prefer this much
> > over the current situation referenced above.
> >
> > 3rd, selecting reply would reply to the original poster, selecting
> > reply-all would send email to the original poster and the list. (the
> > solution referenced by the web site link)
> >
> > I'm leaning towards #2.
> >
> > --
> > Until later: Geoffrey           esoteric at 3times25.net
> >
> > The latest, most widespread virus?  Microsoft end user agreement.
> > Think about it...
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
>
>

_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale