[ale] [hbbs at attbi.com: Reply-To]

[Jeff Hubbs]

That's the way it was before - original reply-to was retained.  Now,
having it that way does tend to result in getting double messages
sometimes, but that's only some of the time after posting.

- Jeff

On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 13:25, Chris Farris wrote:
> 
> Which way do we want it? (I don't recall what it was on the old box)
> 
> Chris
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Jeff Hubbs <hbbs at attbi.com> -----
> 
> Delivered-To: chris-ale at room17.com
> Delivered-To: ale.org-chrisf at ale.org
> Subject: Reply-To
> From: Jeff Hubbs <hbbs at attbi.com>
> To: ale-admin at ale.org
> Date: 01 Dec 2002 11:09:45 -0500
> Errors-To: ale-owner at ale.org
> X-BeenThere: ale at ale.org
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
> List-Id: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale.ale.org>
> List-Subscribe: <http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale>,
> 	<mailto:ale-request at ale.org?subject=subscribe>
> List-Archive: <http://www.ale.org/pipermail/ale/>
> 
> Hi -
> 
> Is it deliberate to have all the Reply-To addresses for messages posted
> to the list be set to ale at ale.org?  Used to be, it was set to that of
> the original message, which made it possible to do an off-list reply by
> just hitting "Reply" in the mail client.
> 
> - Jeff
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> 
> -- 
> Chris Farris				chris at room17.com	
> "One World, One Web, One Program"
> -- Microsoft Promotional Ad
> "Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer"
> -- Adolf Hitler
> _______________________________________________
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org
> http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale


_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
Ale at ale.org
http://www.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale