[ale] hard drive integrity
Geoffrey
esoteric at 3times25.net
Thu Aug 8 14:42:34 EDT 2002
Jim wrote:
> Uhh...that's exactly what happens when you run e2fsck with the -c option.
> Check the man page if you don't believe me.
Let me make sure we understand each other. So it finds 10 blocks bad,
marks them bad and finishes the format? If this is the case, I was not
aware that mkfs did this, I thought it just noted the bad blocks for
reference. Come to think of it, that's kinda stupid...
>
> On Thursday 08 August 2002 02:23 pm, Geoffrey wrote:
>
>>Thanks for the info, I'll check it out. Next, I thought there was a way
>>to mark sections of a disk bad in order to use the 'good' portion of the
>>disk. Anyone know about this possibility?
>>
>>Danny Cox wrote:
>>
>>>Geoffrey,
>>>
>>>On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 10:41, Geoffrey wrote:
>>>
>>>>anyone know of any tools that can verify the integrity of a hard drive?
>>>> I know you can check for bad blocks via mkfs, but I'm curious if
>>>>anyone knows of any other linux based tools.
>>>>
>>> mkfs calls badblocks, which has a man page. You can specify read-only,
>>>destructive-write, or non-destructive-read-write modes. Notice the
>>>warning if you're gonna want to use it's output with e2fsck later,
>>>though.
>>>
>>> Start it, and stand well back ;-)
>>>
>
>
--
Until later: Geoffrey esoteric at 3times25.net
I didn't have to buy my radio from a specific company to listen
to FM, why doesn't that apply to the Internet (anymore...)?
---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
More information about the Ale
mailing list