[ale] mac v pc
aaron
aaron at pd.org
Wed Apr 10 01:21:15 EDT 2002
> on Monday, April 08, 2002, Stephen Turner wondered:
> > linux on mac vs pc, how does that differ? is the
> > performance greatly better? is it only the kernel that changes?
On Tuesday 09 April 2002 19:20, Chris Fowler wrote:
> I believe you get less speed for more buck. I'm not sure. The only
> thing that has kept me and most of the intel world out of Mac is cost
> of entry. When I can pay $300 for 1GHz machine I just can't see paying
> 2,000 for a mac. Someone here could prove me wrong.
There *is* the one plus that, despite the cost, an absolutely minimal
portion of your Mac purchase goes to the criminals at M$ (ignoring that
M$ owns a significant interest in Apple and Mac buyers get further
M$hafted with licensing for Internet Exploiter [et al]).
Buying any "over the counter" x86 based system pretty much guarantees
that Micro$haft extracted their pound of extortion money from a
manufacturer or distributor somewhere up the line from you. Even if a
winblows OS isn't installed on the system, the SOP for M$ OEM contracts
is to require winblows be used for all final x86 system QC testing.
On third though, I guess about the only way to avoid the M$ penalty is to
build your x86 box from components.
;-)
Oh, yeah... you also have the option of installing Linux on a 25 to 50
mhz 68040/68060 Amiga!
;-)
peace
(after justice)
aaron
---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
More information about the Ale
mailing list