[ale] PAM delays
Keith Hopkins
hne at hopnet.net
Fri Apr 5 18:52:13 EST 2002
Chris Fowler wrote:
> You can do what I did. Rewrite most of everything
> used. That way you *know* what it is doing.
>
> I'll give you an example. I removed sysVinit 2.58 and
> replaced it with mine. I do not support run levels. I
> do not need them. I found a bug in a tty driver becuase my
> init would fire off jobs extremely fast. The tty driver could
> not handle the all the open()'s at nearly the same time. I
> had to place a minor nanosleep in the fire() function.
>
> I hate PAM. I can not stand miss typing my password and having to
> wait almost 2 seconds to get another login because PAM is
> cleaning itself up.
>
Is that the only reason you hate PAM? (I'll admit, there are other reasons :-) That delay is a secuiry feature. It was "designed in" to lengthen the time it would take war-dialers to crack your password. It's also configurable. I've got the delay on my firewall set to about 10 seconds.
--
Lost in Tokyo,
Keith
Jack of All Trades, Anarchist
---
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
More information about the Ale
mailing list