Journaling File Systems and RAID (was RE: [ale] ext3)
Greg
runman at telocity.com
Wed Sep 19 18:29:29 EDT 2001
Yes. Reiserfs is quite mature... older I think than ext3. I am using it
now and think that it is the best thing since sliced bread...
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ale at ale.org [mailto:owner-ale at ale.org] On Behalf Of Davis,
Ricardo C.
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:42 PM
To: 'Stuffed Crust'
Cc: 'ale at ale.org'
Subject: RE: Journaling File Systems and RAID (was RE: [ale] ext3)
I see now ... since I haven't had the opportunity to work with systems that
*needed* 300 GB filesystems I had no idea that a fsck would take that long.
In my cursory research yesterday it appeared that ext3 wasn't at version 1.0
yet...although I may have been looking at an old page. Are there any other
options for journaling file systems that are a bit more mature than ext3?
-RD
-----Original Message-----
From: Stuffed Crust [mailto:pizza at shaftnet.org]
To: ale at ale.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 12:40 PM
To: Davis, Ricardo C.
Cc: ale at ale.org
Subject: Re: Journaling File Systems and RAID (was RE: [ale] ext3)
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:21:47AM -0400, Davis, Ricardo C. wrote:
> I have storage question. Why run a journaling file system with RAID 5?
> Isn't this overkill? What do you gain that you wouldn't with just a RAID
5
> configuration?
RAID is there to prevent against hardware failure killing our storage
systems.
A journalling filesystem is in use to keep fscks from taking three hours
on a 300G filesystem.
They're both there to solve different problems.
- Pizza
--
Solomon Peachy pizzaATfucktheusers.org
I ain't broke, but I'm badly bent. ICQ# 1318344
Patience comes to those who wait.
...It's not "Beanbag Love", it's a "Transanimate Relationship"...
--
To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message
body.
--
To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.
More information about the Ale
mailing list