[ale] Are our Ethernet drivers in danger?
Joseph A. Knapka
jknapka at earthlink.net
Tue Jul 3 18:21:29 EDT 2001
This is a quite from a message in the siliconvalley.com forum
on open-source vs commercial software:
<URL:
http://forums.siliconvalley.com/msgshow.cfm/msgboard=5968009897410465&msg=4951219996565791&page=1&idDispSub=5145094516046185>.
Essentially, the argument is that Donald Becker's release under
GPL of Ethernet drivers developed with NASA funding is a violation
of federal law. Does anyone here know enough about IP law to have
an informed opinion about this matter?
> | Search | Send to a Friend | Help
> << Prev Msg | Next Msg >>
>
> Author
> Message
>
>
> Brett_Glass
> 06/28/01 10:31 PM
>
> RE: RE: The government should not sponsor
> GPLed work
>
> You [Bruce Perens - JAK] write:
>
>
> NASA has sponsored a good deal of [work on Linux].
> For example, many of the ethernet drivers by Donald
> Becker were sponsored by NASA.
>
>
> If so, it is contrary to Federal law for those drivers to have been
> licensed under the GPL, because Federal law requires that the fruits of
> NASA's research and development be available for use by the private
> sector to develop new products. A vendor that wishes to use the code
> might well want to pursue this.
-- Joe Knapka
"You know how many remote castles there are along the gorges? You
can't MOVE for remote castles!" -- Lu Tze re. Uberwald
// Linux MM Documentation in progress:
// http://home.earthlink.net/~jknapka/linux-mm/vmoutline.html
* Evolution is an "unproven theory" in the same sense that gravity is. *
--
To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.
More information about the Ale
mailing list