[ale] uptime?

[Bao Ha]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ale at ale.org [mailto:owner-ale at ale.org]On Behalf Of Jim
> Popovitch
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 9:53 PM
> To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts
> Subject: Re: [ale] uptime?
> .....
> I have to object to your examples of stable WinNT 'systems'.  WINS &
> DNS are minor (majorly minor) apps.  You might have a leg to stand on
> if you could say the same thing about a WinNT webserver (IIS or
> Apache), and more so if it was one that did something productive.

NT/IIS 4/SP4: hosting more than 30 web sites.

It is about as stable as its two Linux siblings, almost a year!

I also have a Linux server crashed and burned at least once a week.  
Well, it is running Debian (unstable) Sid.  I have been doing for
more than three years. And last month is the first time I  
understand why it deserves the label "unstable".  

I was also the admin of an NT 4/SP4 running Kana's Silknet 100K+
CRM package last summer.  That poor thing died almost everyday
for three months.  

So, uptime still means S**T!!!

Bao

--
To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.