[ale] next stupid ipchains question

[Joe Knapka]

I have worked in environments with multiple 192.168.x.x subnets
and routed packets amongst them, with a Linux router no less.
Possibly you mean they can't be routed over the Internet, which
is true, but only by convention, AFAIK.

-- Joe

Jim Kinney wrote:
> 
> I read somewhere that the class C 192.168.x.x addresses can't be routed by
> default. The only way to move them around through multiple networks is by
> masq. So, by dropping the -j MASQ from the forward chain, the entire
> packet become unroutable.
> 
> >From the topology sketch, masq from the net_2 is a best bet situation if
> net_1 is handled by a switch.
> 
> JimK
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.

-- 
*** Joseph Knapka ***
In any formula, constants (especially those obtained from handbooks)
are to be treated as variables.
--
To unsubscribe: mail majordomo at ale.org with "unsubscribe ale" in message body.