[ale] VMware and RH5.2

[Wandered Inn]

Anyone else tried running vmware under Linux?  I've fired it up a couple
of times, and each time I ended up having to hit the reset button.  I'm
not running the prescribed hardware, (pentium 200/128M mem), but I would
have expected it to just run a bit slower.  I've given up on it as I
don't want to trash my system.

I've also failed to find the docs that tell you how to run an existing
environment.  That is, I'd like to fire up win95 that is already
installed in my drive via vmware under Linux.  Any pointers as to where
this is defined??

cfowler at avana.net wrote:
> 
> http://www.vmware.com/software/vmware-wizard.gz
> 
> This fixes all problems with vmware-wizard.  If you do not have
> a fast processor it will run very slow.  I have been able to
> run FreeBSD 2.2.6 and Win98 under vmware.  My PC is too slow
> to run Solaris 2.5 and would not boot up OpenBSD.  I have not
> tried NetBSD.  They state you can not run SCO or UnixWare.  Hope
> this info helps.
> 
> It seems that when the guest OS is idle vmware runs around 95%
> of CPU time on the host OS.  I hope the final product does not
> do this.
> 
> Please email me your comments on vmware.
> 
> Chris
> 
> --- Original Message ---
> "Baron Shatturday" <saturday at deathsdoor.com> Wrote on
> Wed, 9 Apr 1997 15:32:58 -0400
>  ------------------
> Chris asks something dear to my heart:
> 
> > VMWare Wizard states that fdisk 2.1 is not supported but this
> > is the default fdisk that comes with RH5.2.  Does anyone know
> > which version is supported and could e-mail me that binary?
> 
> This is the same error I get when I try to run VMWare.  I, too
> would
> consider it a great boon if someone could enlighten me on this
> issue.  I
> really wanna run that VM stuff.
> 
> da Baron

--
Until later: Geoffrey		esoteric at denali.atlnet.com

It should be illegal to yell "Y2K" in a crowded economy.
	-- Larry Wall, creator of the programming language Perl