[ale] Linux/Apache/LHS review in mainstream press

[Geoffrey Myers]

I can't believe anyone would perform such a one-sided comparison.  Why wouldn't
they choose common hardware?

}
}Daniel Boyd wrote:
}> 
}> Hi all,
}> 
}> The July 7 issue of InfoWorld includes a comparison of web servers
}> that pits RedHat Linux 4.2/Apache 1.1.3/Linux Hardware Solutions
}> against AIX/ICSS/RS6000 against NT/IIS/HP NetServer LX against
}> NT/Netscape Enterprise Server 3.0/Compaq ProLiant 5000.  While the
}> Linux box came in last (hobbled by only a single processor compared
}> with 4 for the other platforms) I feel it is another win for the
}> Linux community to be tested against the heavy-weights.
}> 
}> Dan
}> 
}> Daniel Boyd, CNA              Voice: 706/236-1750
}> Network Manager               Fax: 706/238-7858
}> Computing and Technology      email: dboyd at berry.edu
}> Berry College         "We are confronted with
}>                        insurmountable opportunities."
}>                              -Walt Kelly
}
}Too bad no-one can get a public response up to have printed showing
}the Linux on a Quad or Multi-Proc machine...  Kinda interesting
}they left Linux like that...
}
}Robert
}
}-- 
}---------------------------------------------------------------------------
}Robert L. Harris          |   If NT is the answer, 
}System Engineer For Hire. \_    You don't understand the question 
}
}Email:
}Robert at ast.lmco.com
}http://www.orci.com/~nomad
}
}DISCLAIMER:
}  These are MY OPINIONS ALONE.  I speak for no-one else.
}
}perl -e 'print
}$i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'
}


-- 
Until later:
Geoffrey Myers   geof at abraxis.com	http://www.abraxis.com/geof

	Opinions expressed by me are mine, all mine, only mine.....