<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 19 April 2013 18:24, Chris Adams <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cmadams@hiwaay.net" target="_blank">cmadams@hiwaay.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">Once upon a time, Dennis Gilmore <<a href="mailto:ausil@fedoraproject.org">ausil@fedoraproject.org</a>> said:<br>
> Fedora 19 Alpha has been staged and should now be available at<br>
> pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/19-Alpha it is 40G and the rpms are<br>
> hardlinked to development/19<br>
<br>
</div>No, once again, the RPMs are not hardlinked. The problem appears to be<br>
that development/19 RPMS are mode 0644, while releases/test/19-Alpha<br>
RPMS are mode 0664 (group writable), which means "hardlink" won't link<br>
them (unless you add -c).<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>How are you not seeing it hardlinked? Doing an ls shows they are hardlinked.</div><div><br></div><div style><div>-rw-r--r--. 2 ftpsync ftpsync 1316820 Mar 16 19:17 ./19-Alpha/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/m/midori-0.4.9-1.fc19.i686.rpm</div>
<div>-rw-r--r--. 2 ftpsync ftpsync 1317288 Mar 16 18:54 ./19-Alpha/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/a/aspell-ca-2.1.5-6.fc19.i686.rpm</div><div>-rw-r--r--. 2 ftpsync ftpsync 13178240 Mar 23 04:31 ./19-Alpha/Fedora/source/SRPMS/r/ruby-2.0.0.0-6.fc19.src.rpm</div>
<div>-rw-r--r--. 2 ftpsync ftpsync 13181844 Mar 16 17:19 ./19-Alpha/Fedora/x86_64/os/Packages/k/kde-workspace-4.10.1-2.fc19.x86_64.rpm</div><div>-rw-r--r--. 2 ftpsync ftpsync 131850 Mar 16 20:47 ./19-Alpha/Fedora/source/SRPMS/h/hunspell-cv-1.02-5.fc19.src.rpm</div>
<div>-rw-r--r--. 2 ftpsync ftpsync 132060 Mar 16 20:14 ./19-Alpha/Fedora/source/SRPMS/l/lohit-tamil-fonts-2.5.3-1.fc19.src.rpm</div><div>-rw-r--r--. 2 ftpsync ftpsync 1320736 Mar 16 17:35 ./19-Alpha/Fedora/source/SRPMS/n/nss-softokn-3.14.3-1.fc19.src.rpm</div>
<div>-rw-r--r--. 2 ftpsync ftpsync 132124 Mar 16 18:46 ./19-Alpha/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/x/xorg-x11-drv-geode-2.11.14-6.fc19.i686.rpm</div><div><br></div><div style><br></div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Why are the permissions different in different parts of the Fedora tree?<br>
For example, updates is 2755 (g+ws), while directories under updates are<br>
0755, 0775, and 2755.<br>
<span class=""><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Chris Adams <<a href="mailto:cmadams@hiwaay.net">cmadams@hiwaay.net</a>><br>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services<br>
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.<br>
<br>
--<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Stephen J Smoogen.<br><br></div>
</div></div>