<div dir="auto">that's very little traffic.. I'd be surprised if any rpi could do even 100 Mb/s with any aes based VPN. <br><br><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Sent from my mobile. Please excuse the brevity, spelling, and punctuation. </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Feb 11, 2017 2:29 AM, "Alex Carver" <<a href="mailto:agcarver%2Bale@acarver.net">agcarver+ale@acarver.net</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 2017-02-10 20:29, Derek Atkins wrote:<br>
<br>
> I'm not worried about VPN capacity, per se. I certainly don't expect any<br>
> VPN'ed client to fully use 1gbps! I dont even expect it to use 500mbps.<br>
> My VPN concern would be CPU usage if there's not AES-NI, but even 10mbps<br>
> VPN would, IMHO, probably be good enough. But that's not the primary<br>
> goal; the primary goal is 1gbps NAT.<br>
<br>
I run OpenVPN on a Raspberry Pi 2 behind my router (currently a Linksys<br>
running OpenWRT). Other than the initial handshake taking about 10<br>
seconds (I have an extremely large key) it's been fast enough to handle<br>
four IP camera feeds (5-10 fps 640x480), a VNC session (via SSH tunnel)<br>
plus some web traffic all simultaneously without a glitch. Anything<br>
bigger than the RPi2 will probably not even notice.<br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Ale mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/ale</a><br>
See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at<br>
<a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>