<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Steve Litt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:slitt@troubleshooters.com" target="_blank">slitt@troubleshooters.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">> Even doing scripting for just server stuff, Node is far faster than<br>
> Ruby in almost every case --<br>
> <a href="http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64/compare.php?lang=v8&lang2=yarv" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64/compare.php?lang=v8&lang2=yarv</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</span>Ruby != Rails.<br>
<br>
Development speed != Run speed.<br>
<br>
So I stand by my original statement that the person good enough at<br>
Rails to bring up apps quickly will be in demand.<br>
<br>
By the way, I'm not making a statement about the development speed of<br>
Nod.js or Angular.js etc: I'm not familiar enough to make such a<br>
statement. I do know that Rails develops lightning fast.</blockquote></div><br>I was specifically comparing the default runtime environments for both JavaScript and Ruby. Even a poorly written JS application is going to start and execute quicker than an equivalent Ruby application (despite its level of "good").</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I never mentioned any frameworks on top of the base environment for JS. I certainly didn't bring Angular into the conversation.<br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>James Sumners<br><a href="http://james.sumners.info/" target="_blank">http://james.sumners.info/</a> (technical profile)</div><div><a href="http://jrfom.com/" target="_blank">http://jrfom.com/</a> (personal site)</div><div><a href="http://haplo.bandcamp.com/" target="_blank">http://haplo.bandcamp.com/</a> (band page)</div></div></div></div></div>
</div></div>