<div dir="ltr">~shrug~ I'm actually avoiding the encryption feature. I use it for the easy interface to restore specific files and automatically rotating a full backup every few days. But I also needed a way to store my backups on a Windows server so that they'd be included on the tape backups (not handled by me). So the tar volumes were the biggest selling point.<div><br></div><div>But now we're looking at better solutions. We like the look of, and think we're getting, Unitrends's product -- <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=20&v=AGdZ-CY5tVk">https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=20&v=AGdZ-CY5tVk</a> . So I hopefully won't be using duplicity too much longer. </div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Edward Holcroft <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eholcroft@mkainc.com" target="_blank">eholcroft@mkainc.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-size:small">Maybe I should bite the bullet, do a full backup for as long as it takes, and then see how long a differential takes. If differentials are reasonably quick, then I don't have a problem ... I guess. Maybe it is just to do with those initial calcs ... still, compared to plain old rsync, seems a heavy price to pay for just adding encryption.</div><div style="font-size:small"><br></div><div style="font-size:small">ed</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>James Sumners<br><a href="http://james.sumners.info/" target="_blank">http://james.sumners.info/</a> (technical profile)</div><div><a href="http://jrfom.com/" target="_blank">http://jrfom.com/</a> (personal site)</div><div><a href="http://haplo.bandcamp.com/" target="_blank">http://haplo.bandcamp.com/</a> (band page)</div></div></div></div></div>
</div></div>