<p dir="ltr"><br>
On Mar 7, 2015 8:31 AM, "DJ-Pfulio" <<a href="mailto:DJPfulio@jdpfu.com">DJPfulio@jdpfu.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On 03/07/2015 08:08 AM, Jim Kinney wrote:<br>
> > The Republican definition of freedom generally refers only to owners and never<br>
> > to users.<br>
> ><br>
><br>
> If there is plenty of competition - perhaps 10 competitors, I don't have an<br>
> issue with the network owner being allowed to seek niche spaces in the market.<br>
> Some people may want to pay to have proactive blocking? I dunno.<br>
><br>
> When there are fewer competitors, or an effective monopoly (like we have with<br>
> broadband service in the USA), the customers may need protections - mainly after<br>
> the company has proven to be anti-customer in the past on numerous occasions.<br>
> Competition is clearly not working in those cases.</p>
<p dir="ltr">+1</p>
<p dir="ltr">There's no competition for broadband now. </p>
<p dir="ltr">I have a problem with an access provider also being in the content creation business as well. <br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Ale mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a><br>
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at<br>
> <a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo</a><br>
</p>