<p dir="ltr">That's my understanding but the virtualbox instance might be a slow without the VT-x. I found making the VM disk a fixed size instead of dynamically allocated helps with performance.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Feb 17, 2015 9:02 AM, "Narahari 'n' Savitha" <<a href="mailto:savithari@gmail.com">savithari@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Friends:<div><br></div><div>I just found that the two laptops I have </div><div><br></div><div>1. Core2Duo (2006 CPU) without VT-x</div><div>2. Netbook with Atom CPU.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>It is my understanding that I am not able to use KVM on these machines but I can use Virtualbox. Is that a fair understanding or I can't do any virtualization at all ?</div><div><br></div><div>Please advise.</div><div><br></div><div>-Narahar</div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Ale mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a><br>
See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at<br>
<a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>