<p dir="ltr">Twm had one good thing. It was EXTREMELY lightweight so it was useful for times when max horsepower was needed for application needs. Lots of astronomy apps and early graphing apps were best under twm. And it could be set to always put a specific app window sized as desired at a fixed location. May be the first to do that.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 27, 2014 6:44 PM, "JD" <<a href="mailto:jdp@algoloma.com">jdp@algoloma.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Tried twm for 15 minutes once. If the point was how bad some software can be,<br>
they definitely NAILED it.<br>
<br>
On 01/27/2014 06:30 PM, Jim Kinney wrote:<br>
> Twm.<br>
><br>
> On Jan 27, 2014 6:24 PM, "JD" <<a href="mailto:jdp@algoloma.com">jdp@algoloma.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jdp@algoloma.com">jdp@algoloma.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Still trying to find anything better than fvwm.<br>
><br>
> > then he had to re-align all his window tiles... someone moved one:)<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Ale mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a><br>
See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at<br>
<a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo</a><br>
</blockquote></div>