<div dir="ltr">On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Pete Hardie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pete.hardie@gmail.com" target="_blank">pete.hardie@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small">So it's not Pyhton itself, but the fact that it is interpreted into something above assembly code, when is then converted to machine code, leaving you with the inability to map one line of Python code to its assembly code (== verifiable) equivalent?<br>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Also, brainf*ck maps very easily to assembly code for easy verification.</div><div><br></div><div>I think that this programming language debate is showing a clear winner.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Johnny </div></div></div></div>