<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:59 PM, leam hall <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:leamhall@gmail.com" target="_blank">leamhall@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>If you send something over public wire/wireless, it can be read by anyone without warrant.</div>
</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This is the fundamental point on which the disagreement lies. Until warrantless wiretapping was made pseudo-legal, we recognized that private communication over "public" wires was protected. Email is similar in nature to a phone conversation, in terms of privacy and tap-ability.</div>
</div></div></div>