<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>RHEV-H is the hypervisor, and you do need a RHEL box for the management software. You can also use a RHEL box for the hypervisor layer. You might make the choice based on the management tools you want to use to maintain the hypervisors or your VM pricing.</div><div><br></div><div>You still need storage, wether that be iSCSI or Fiber Channel, which is presented to the hypervisor layer.</div><div><br></div><div>-Scott</div><div><br>On Oct 30, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Jim Kinney <<a href="mailto:jim.kinney@gmail.com">jim.kinney@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><p>I thought rhev-h was the hypervisor. I have one of those plu a manager box and a storage server with iscsi. Plus the requisite IPA server.only the manager and hypervisor are rhel. Others are centos. Stack supports adding generic kvm server stacks as virt hosts as long as ovurt tools are installed. </p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Oct 30, 2012 8:55 AM, "Scott McBrien" <<a href="mailto:smcbrien@gmail.com">smcbrien@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Allen,<br>
<br>
RHEV can either use a RHEL hypervisor (which you pay your normal pricing for RHEL) or a more appliance-y RHEL based distro called RHEV-H which has its own pricing.<br>
<br>
If you're interested in evaluating RHEV, it might be worth while to take the RH318 training class. I see a lot of people check it out that way.<br>
<br>
-Scott<br>
<br>
On Oct 29, 2012, at 11:59 PM, "Beddingfield, Allen" <<a href="mailto:allen@ua.edu">allen@ua.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> So what does it end up approximately costing you per-host? Our cost per-physical host for RHEL is higher than our cost for VMware Enterprise Plus on a 4 socket server :)<br>
> If we were going that route, I would probably do KVM on SUSE SLES with the libvirt tools or Citrix XenServer, since we already have both of those in house.<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Allen Beddingfield<br>
> Systems Engineer<br>
> The University of Alabama<br>
> ________________________________<br>
> From: <a href="mailto:ale-bounces@ale.org">ale-bounces@ale.org</a> [<a href="mailto:ale-bounces@ale.org">ale-bounces@ale.org</a>] on behalf of Jim Kinney [<a href="mailto:jim.kinney@gmail.com">jim.kinney@gmail.com</a>]<br>
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 9:54 PM<br>
> To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts<br>
> Subject: Re: [ale] snarky use of RedHat - heh, heh<br>
><br>
><br>
> RHEL is a different pricing structure than VMWare. Vmware has limits per tier on cpu sockets but not redhat.<br>
> Virt stuff is all gpl from rh. Manager will be in Centos once no longer beta. Use licensees for high profile stuff and centos for others.<br>
><br>
> On Oct 29, 2012 9:19 PM, "Beddingfield, Allen" <<a href="mailto:allen@ua.edu">allen@ua.edu</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:allen@ua.edu">allen@ua.edu</a>>> wrote:<br>
> While I do not doubt that VMware has valid reasons to be quaking in their boots, I'm not sure that Redhat would be the cause. From my experience, they aren't much less expensive than VMware :) Of course, my perspective may be a bit skewed. I am in higher-ed, where everything is influenced by how large the academic discount will be. Redhat's academic discounts are small compared with those of their competitors. It would probably work out more expensive for us to switch to RHEV.<br>
> Allen B.<br>
> --<br>
> Allen Beddingfield<br>
> Systems Engineer<br>
> The University of Alabama<br>
><br>
> ________________________________________<br>
> From: <a href="mailto:ale-bounces@ale.org">ale-bounces@ale.org</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:ale-bounces@ale.org">ale-bounces@ale.org</a>> [<a href="mailto:ale-bounces@ale.org">ale-bounces@ale.org</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:ale-bounces@ale.org">ale-bounces@ale.org</a>>] on behalf of Jim Kinney [<a href="mailto:jim.kinney@gmail.com">jim.kinney@gmail.com</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:jim.kinney@gmail.com">jim.kinney@gmail.com</a>>]<br>
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 5:25 PM<br>
> To: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts - Yes! We run Linux!<br>
> Subject: [ale] snarky use of RedHat - heh, heh<br>
><br>
> for those that have known me for a while, my loathing of all things<br>
> Microsoft is legendary. I saw the light of FREEDOM in 1992 and fully<br>
> embraced "My True Calling" in 1997. But sometimes people pay me to<br>
> kick a windwoes machine around the block.<br>
><br>
> I finished a set up of RedHat Enterprise Virtualization 3.1 Beta (only<br>
> slightly easier than a simultaneous root canal and colonoscopy with no<br>
> pain killers.) and they have succeeded in removing the horrid<br>
> requirement of needed a WindWoes system to run the RHEV Manager gui.<br>
> It's a JBOSS stack and the preferred console interface is spice.<br>
><br>
> It works quite well. Some bits are "different" but I am loading up a<br>
> Win7 as a test OS. If that pile of crap will load, ANYTHING will run!<br>
><br>
> This should have VMWare quaking in their boots.<br>
><br>
> Wolf- It finally worked!<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> --<br>
> James P. Kinney III<br>
><br>
> Every time you stop a school, you will have to build a jail. What you<br>
> gain at one end you lose at the other. It's like feeding a dog on his<br>
> own tail. It won't fatten the dog.<br>
> - Speech 11/23/1900 Mark Twain<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://electjimkinney.org" target="_blank">http://electjimkinney.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://heretothereideas.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://heretothereideas.blogspot.com/</a><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Ale mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</a>><br>
> <a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a><br>
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at<br>
> <a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo</a><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Ale mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</a><mailto:<a href="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</a>><br>
> <a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a><br>
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at<br>
> <a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo</a><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Ale mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a><br>
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at<br>
> <a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Ale mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a><br>
See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at<br>
<a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Ale mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</a></span><br><span><a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a></span><br><span>See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at</span><br><span><a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>