<p>Both unity and gnome3 appear designed for touchscreens only. They both generally suck for productiveness as a keyboarded desktop that can be taolored to fit the users workflow.<br>
I've been using gnome3 for a year+ now. I can get things done but it's clunkier. I loath the application menu. It opens to ALL applications. Why not most recent? If I have a shell open anywhere and I want another opened where I am, I have to open a new shell with a different click process because the designers change what the buttons do in use. If already running a left click takes me to the currently open shell window.<br>
It's basically gui for dummies.<br>
The screen preview mode displays a title from the active portion of each window. Why not show the application name or at least it's icon? With 6 or more open windows on one screen, preview mode text is too small to read.</p>
<p>If I had wanted a f***ing ipad I would have hit my head on a hard object until I changed my mind.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jul 27, 2012 5:49 PM, "Sergio Chaves" <<a href="mailto:sergio.chaves@gmail.com">sergio.chaves@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Is GNOME Shell really that bad?<br>I am still on Fedora 14, so I am clueless.<br><a href="http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/opensource/ubuntu-unity-now-on-fedora-another-win-for-freedom/3744?tag=nl.e011" target="_blank">http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/opensource/ubuntu-unity-now-on-fedora-another-win-for-freedom/3744?tag=nl.e011</a><br>
<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Ale mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a><br>
See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at<br>
<a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>