talk to Scott Moulton.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Jim Lynch <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ale_nospam@fayettedigital.com" target="_blank">ale_nospam@fayettedigital.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On 07/10/2012 01:38 PM, Michael Trausch wrote:<br>
> To be a bit better about it: a credential, used in a court case, is<br>
> seen as satisfactory proof of competency. I think that is probably a<br>
> bad idea as it only proves that the person passed as competent at some<br>
> point in the past. A person should have to actually prove their<br>
> competence on a case-by-case basis, instead of the judge telling the<br>
> jury that a credential is proof positive itself. Just my two cents,<br>
> though.<br>
</div>Where on earth did you get the idea that the practice of law involves<br>
reason? ;-)<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Jim.<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Ale mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</a><br>
<a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</a><br>
See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at<br>
<a href="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo" target="_blank">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Charles Selfridge<br><br>PBYC IT director<div><br></div><div>(404) 910-3409</div><br>