<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.30.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
You're absolutely right Greg. I have on occasion had to have the heads cleaned and cleared from dried ink. Not expensive to have done but necessary from time-to-time if not using the printer. Still, for the price, you can't beat the results (at least nothing I've come across thus far).<BR>
<BR>
RinL<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
<B>From</B>: Greg Clifton <<A HREF="mailto:Greg%20Clifton%20%3cgccfof5@gmail.com%3e">gccfof5@gmail.com</A>><BR>
<B>Reply-to</B>: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale@ale.org><BR>
<B>To</B>: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <<A HREF="mailto:Atlanta%20Linux%20Enthusiasts%20%3cale@ale.org%3e">ale@ale.org</A>><BR>
<B>Subject</B>: Re: [ale] More Lightscribe for Linux<BR>
<B>Date</B>: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:31:40 -0400<BR>
<BR>
One caution on Epson printers, they are piezo printers vs thermal printers like HP, etc. The technology allows for much smaller ink droplets and much finer control of the ink delivery, hence the higher quality results from Epson. The heads are also more durable than the thermal units, which is one reason the Epson heads do not get replaced with the ink cartridges as with most others. HOWEVER, they don't like sitting around not being used with some regularity. I.e. if you don't use it and the ink dries out in the head you have great difficulty reviving the printer. Caveat, this info comes from my experience with Epsons from ~6 yrs ago so Epson may have improved the heads in that time. It is my understanding that their wide format printers have a [ink-o-phobic] coating in the printer nozzles that helps to prevent clogging. I don't know if they have applied that technology in the $100 printers.<BR>
<BR>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Scott Castaline <<A HREF="mailto:skotchman@gmail.com">skotchman@gmail.com</A>> wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
On 07/11/2011 10:02 AM, arxaaron wrote:<BR>
> On 2011/07/09, at 15:26 , Cornelis van Dijk wrote:<BR>
><BR>
>> Thanks to all that replied to my previous post about Lightscribe for<BR>
>> Linux. Meanwhile I succeeded by using inkscape at 180 dpi and get a<BR>
>> good sharp image with the Memorex Lightscribe drive.<BR>
>><BR>
>> Another problem that I have with Lightscribe for Linux is that it<BR>
>> takes about sixteen minutes to burn a label. This is probably because<BR>
>> the bitmap covers nearly the entire cd surface. Usually I have quite a<BR>
>> bit of text, so cutting on that is not going to help much. Not only<BR>
>> that, but after one burn the image is barely legible so that I have to<BR>
>> do a second burn on top of the first one to get a decent image. While<BR>
>> this works fine, it now takes me over half an hour to burn a label!<BR>
>> Is there a way around this?<BR>
>><BR>
> Your experiences with bLight Scribble, as reiterated by others<BR>
> on this thread, just reinforces my previous observation that<BR>
> the technology is a gimmick. Perhaps fine for labeling one<BR>
> or two disks in pinch, but too low contrast, low quality and<BR>
> time consuming to be really useful.<BR>
><BR>
> Only thing to suggest for improving speed and output is to<BR>
> push the contrast of your image before you send it to print<BR>
> (e.g. output from scribus as pdf file, load into gimp& adjust).<BR>
><BR>
> If the background areas are maximum white, they should<BR>
> be read as "transparent" in printing and the laser might<BR>
> not have to etch those areas. The increased contrast may<BR>
> help overcome the marginal contrast of the technology as<BR>
> well and keep your process to one pass. Interesting that<BR>
> you can do a "second burn" pass and have it align to the<BR>
> first, though.<BR>
><BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
I'm glad that I wasn't the only one that had questionable thoughts on<BR>
this. I was thinking that it maybe possible to get the alignment correct<BR>
if you could tell the sftwe to write twice without stopping.
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
>> I know that hp sells a specialized printer for cd labels<BR>
>> (saw it a Fry's), but it uses special blanks and probably<BR>
>> uses Windows. Anyone know about this?<BR>
> I've used both Epson and HP inkjet printers with CD/DVD<BR>
> printing capability. At least for these low cost units, the<BR>
> Epson produced much better quality than the HP.<BR>
><BR>
> Linux CUPS print drivers will be available for either<BR>
> since Mac is CUPS and they work fine from OSeX.<BR>
><BR>
> Repeating my earlier recommendation, get yourself one<BR>
> of the several Epson Stylus or Artisan models with CD/DVD<BR>
> print capability and be happy. Inkjet printable media is<BR>
> equivalent in cost to non-printable media. Only costs are<BR>
> in the ink cartridges - my production runs come in with<BR>
> around $0.10 per disk for crisp, high quality black and<BR>
> white or gray scale (that blows bLight Scribble out of the<BR>
> water), or about $0.35 per disk for photo quality color.<BR>
> With my low end Epson models (Stylus 200 / 260), disk<BR>
> print times are 3 to 6 minutes per disk depending on<BR>
> complexity and color of the image.<BR>
><BR>
> Looks like an Epson Artisan 50 can be purchased<BR>
> and delivered for less than $100.<BR>
><BR>
> Epson Artisan 50 Inkjet Printer - Color - CD/DVD Print,<BR>
> Photo ...<BR>
> $82 - 3 stores<BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
Good info Aaron, at that price I might even consider getting one for<BR>
that purpose only. As I prefer to use duped CD's in the car then the<BR>
original and I can't read my own handwriting as my hand written with<BR>
Sharpie label.
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
>> Thanks, Cor<BR>
> peace<BR>
> aaron<BR>
><BR>
> _______________________________________________<BR>
> Ale mailing list<BR>
> <A HREF="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</A><BR>
> <A HREF="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</A><BR>
> See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at<BR>
> <A HREF="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo</A><BR>
<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
Ale mailing list<BR>
<A HREF="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</A><BR>
<A HREF="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</A><BR>
See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at<BR>
<A HREF="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo</A><BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
<PRE>
_______________________________________________
Ale mailing list
<A HREF="mailto:Ale@ale.org">Ale@ale.org</A>
<A HREF="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale</A>
See JOBS, ANNOUNCE and SCHOOLS lists at
<A HREF="http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo">http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo</A>
</PRE>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>