<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Lightner, Jeff <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jlightner@water.com">jlightner@water.com</a>></span> wrote:
<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US"><div><div><p class="MsoNormal"><font face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">Going back to the discussion a couple of weeks ago about
whether Canonical (Ubuntu) is “contributing” or a parasite as some
implied I notice they don’t appear in the list. Since I don’t
know details about the individuals listed I can’t say none of them work
for Canonical but it seems if they did the company would have shown up in the
list.</span></font></p></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br>Canonical has a handful of kernel developers. But you are correct, Mark has said that kernel development is not a key focus of Ubuntu. I think Mark address your concerns pretty well in one of his blog posts [0]<br>
<br>[0] <a href="http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/517">http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/517</a><br><br>-Steve Brown<br></div></div>