<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.28.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
How much heat can Virt-manager handle? How many processors does it need to have to spin out instances? How many processors can it reasonably handle? I am specifically looking for a VM Manager that can handle half a terabyte of ram and over 400 gpu processors (nVidia Tesla) and maby 20 to 40 TB of storage...<BR>
<BR>
Wolf<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
<B>From</B>: Joseph Scalia <<A HREF="mailto:Joseph%20Scalia%20%3cjscalia@redhat.com%3e">jscalia@redhat.com</A>><BR>
<B>Reply-to</B>: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <ale@ale.org><BR>
<B>To</B>: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts <<A HREF="mailto:Atlanta%20Linux%20Enthusiasts%20%3cale@ale.org%3e">ale@ale.org</A>><BR>
<B>Subject</B>: Re: [ale] Fw: VirtualBox<BR>
<B>Date</B>: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:47:04 -0500 (EST)<BR>
<BR>
<PRE>
Jumping in a bit late in the thread... Was there a reason you did not want to use Virt-Manager?
Virt-manager uses remote libvirt calls and supports multiple nodes. Ovirt certainly looks sexier, but there hasn't been a commit since July. That doesn't exactly give me a warm fuzzy feeling for it's future.
678-871-9563
<A HREF="mailto:jscalia@redhat.com">jscalia@redhat.com</A>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Derek Atkins" <<A HREF="mailto:warlord@MIT.EDU">warlord@MIT.EDU</A>>
To: "Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts" <<A HREF="mailto:ale@ale.org">ale@ale.org</A>>
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 9:52:22 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [ale] Fw: VirtualBox
Brian Pitts <<A HREF="mailto:brian@polibyte.com">brian@polibyte.com</A>> writes:
> On 12/15/2010 11:55 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> Yeah, I know about that product; I currently use Vmware-Server.
>> Unfortunately it's been EOL'ed by vmware and there isn't a replacement,
>> so basically I'm looking for something to migrate to. And no, moving to
>> ESXi isn't an option.
>>
>> This is why I'm seriously considering KVM, as it wont "go away" anytime
>> soon.. But I don't know if it has the level of remote management that I
>> need.
>
> Are virsh for command-line access and virt-manager for GUI access not
> good enough? Frankly I think they're much better than vmware server's
> flakey web interface and shoddy scripting support. See parts 30 and 31 of
No, they are not good enough. For one thing, they require local access,
either via shell or desktop. I need remotely-accessible administration
for a VM server. I have VMs that need to be 'run' (and also accessed)
by remote users, and I don't want to provide shell access to them.
> <A HREF="http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Virtualization/index.html">http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Virtualization/index.html</A>
I've done more research and it looks like I *may* be able to use oVirt
on a single system. I'm going to install it on one machine I have and
see if I can get it to work similarly to vmware-server. Or at least see
if I can get it to do the things I needed vmware-server to do, even if
it's not 100% feature-compatible with vmware-server. I didn't actually
use all of vmware-servers's features. ;)
-derek
</PRE>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>