<font face="tahoma,sans-serif"><br></font><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Michael Trausch <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mike@trausch.us">mike@trausch.us</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<p>On Dec 17, 2010 7:22 PM, "Jim Philips" <<a href="mailto:briarpatch.jim@gmail.com" target="_blank">briarpatch.jim@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> The level of old-fartism in this thread is amazing. Of course, <br>
> I realize I'm arguing with a group that only recently <br>
> understood that Pine and Lynx are not the future of the <br>
> Internet. I should add that I am fifty-seven myself. </p>
<p>HEY! I still use pine and lynx! And while I may not exactly a spring chicken, I am not exactly an old fart, either... :)</p>
<p>--<br>
Sent from my G2 running CyanogenMod!<br>
That is, a phone. :)</p></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I know. I don't want to push the point too far. But there is a certain knee-jerk opposition to anything that hit the scene in the last ten years. People should ask themselves if it's rational or generational. I'm just as hard on younger people who think "old" movies couldn't possibly be good.</div>
</div><br>