<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><br><br><div>Extreme support of _individual_ liberty (women choose their reproductive situation, men choose their ejaculation situation) and sharply limited corporate power (no pseudo-royalty by way of multi-generational resource hogging - corps are not people and deserve exactly the same representative voice as a fence post) through the local, state and national government legislative and legal protections of _people_ (nobody starves and nobody owns it all) sounds good to me<font color="#888888"></font>. If I have to pitch in some cash or time to help out, that's OK with me as long as I don't see people more capable of pitching in shirking their responsibilities. The poor donate bodies to support war efforts. The middle class donate cash and bodies for war efforts. The rich are not donating bodies and working hard to not support it with their cash either.<br>
<br>I don't hear teabaggers, libertarians, rightwingnutjobs, leftwingtreehuggers or _any_ congress critter championing that sequence as there's no money or power in it for them so I think they all are filthy, moronic scumbags.<br>
</div></div>blech<br>-- <br>-- <br>James P. Kinney III<br>I would rather stumble along in freedom than walk effortlessly in chains.<br><br><br>