<p>????? That was one of the more focused and tame writings from Aaron. He only referred to the Dibold machines in the pejorative tone and otherwise presented a pretty clear historical recapping of how we got to where we are now.</p>
<p>I think you hit send before you added the Smiley <br>
:-)</p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">On Aug 19, 2010 10:03 AM, "Drifter" <<a href="mailto:drifter@oppositelock.org">drifter@oppositelock.org</a>> wrote:<br><br>Aaron,<br>
This latest screed is over the top -- even for you. Compared to you, Fox<br>
News is a sane, reasoned voice of political commentary. Unfortunately,<br>
this level of invective cheapens your core message on the diabolical<br>
nature of Georgia's current electronic voting machines. And keep in mind<br>
that it is entirely probable that electronic fraud was used to rig a<br>
primary election in North Carolina a few months ago. If all you can do is<br>
rant and rave about past sins, people aren't going to listen when you<br>
talk about the current, ongoing risk of election fraud.<br>
What's done is done. Our job is to keep it from happening again. The<br>
level of invective exhibited below just turns people off. It isn't<br>
helpful. Might feel good to write it, but it doesn't help.<br>
<br>
Remember, if you want someone to heed your message and vote your way,<br>
don't insult him, his family, friends, church and community at the<br>
beginning of your speech.<br>
<br>
See you this evening.<br>
<br>
Sean<br>
<br>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<p><font color="#500050"><br>On Thursday, August 19, 2010 04:22:38 am dude-aaron-omy wrote:<br>> On 2010/08/10, at 16:26 , Greg Fre...</font></p></blockquote></p>