<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.28.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
How does one wield terror, and how does that differ from <BR>
objectifying the adversary in the pursuit of ideological ends?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
<B>From</B>: Geoffrey <<A HREF="mailto:Geoffrey%20%3clists@serioustechnology.com%3e">lists@serioustechnology.com</A>><BR>
<B>Reply-to</B>: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts - Yes! We run Linux! <ale@ale.org><BR>
<B>To</B>: Atlanta Linux Enthusiasts - Yes! We run Linux! <<A HREF="mailto:Atlanta%20Linux%20Enthusiasts%20-%20Yes!%20We%20run%20Linux!%20%3cale@ale.org%3e">ale@ale.org</A>><BR>
<B>Subject</B>: Re: [ale] BP knew of problems 11 months before the rig blew -further OT<BR>
<B>Date</B>: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 08:59:46 -0400<BR>
<BR>
<PRE>
<A HREF="mailto:wolf@wolfhalton.info">wolf@wolfhalton.info</A> wrote:
> @Jeff - Can we let go of the "xx-terrorist" terminology? Unless, of
> course you can find a definition that is held by more than three people
> at a time, it is a religious-war term for persons we don't agree with,
> and adds nothing to the conversation. It is the linguistic framing that
> makes the neo-con forever-war concept seem sane to some people.
Pretty straightforward definition I think:
One who uses terror as a means of coercion.
</PRE>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>